Barbara Mertins
Technische Universität Dortmund, Germany
Katrin Odermann
Technische Universität Dortmund, Germany

Phonological awareness and vocabulary size in bilingual and monolingual children

Keywords: bilingual acquisition, vocabulary size, mental lexicon, monolingual fiction

The ability to think about language at the metalinguistic level is considered as an important prerequisite for children’s cognitive and linguistic development (Roehr-Brackin, 2024; Schneider, 2017). The phonological awareness is one of the first components in the acquisition of metalinguistic skills in children and it correlates positivly with the vocabulary size (Bleses et al., 2011; Fowler, 2001). Additionally, previous research provided evidence for an early development of metalinguistic awareness in bilingual children (Bialystok, 1992; Reder et al., 2013). However, studies investigating the development of vocabulary in bilingual children have shown mixed evidence: some research indicates a smaller vocabulary in bilingual compared to monolingual peers (Cote & Bornstein, 2014). Other findings reveal comparable vocabulary size in both groups (Hoff et al., 2012). Yet other studies suggest a larger vocabulary size for bilingual children (Bosch & Ramon-Casas, 2014). When interpreting these results, it is important to take into account the cognitive underpinnings of the bilingual mind (Bialystok & Craik, 2022; Grosjean, 1994) instead of treating bilingual vocabulary in terms of a single mental lexicon for each language (Perani et al., 1998). For the assessment of the vocabulary size, this means that both languages must be included, a step most of the previous research has not implemented in their designs. 

In this paper we will present data from a large-scale study with German (N=20), Turkish/German (N=20) and Tamil/German (N=20) preschool children (4-6 years). The study includes data from a PPVT test administered for both languages, a phonological awareness test in German (Odermann, 2023) as well as a parental questionnaire (Odermann & Mertins, submitted) evaluating the degree of bilingualism and the socioeconomic status of the family.   The underlying hypotheses for the study were: 1. Balanced bilingual children’s vocabulary is larger in both languages compared to the monolingual group for German and the other nonbalanced bilingual children. 2. Bilingual children develop phonological awareness earlier than monolingual children. 3. The socio-economic status of the parents affects the vocabulary size and the development of metalinguistic skills in all three groups. 

The first results show that the vocabulary size in children with higher input and competence in German and the other language is larger compared to their peers dominant in only one language. The balanced bilingual group also has a larger vocabulary than their monolingual peers. Additionally, balanced bilingual children outperform all other groups in the phonological awareness test. The socioeconomic status of the family can account for some differences in both tested domains across all groups. 

In line with previous research (Bialystok, 1992; Delucchi Danhier & Mertins, 2018), we argue that the cognitive underpinnings of bilingualism (co-activation, code-switching, inhibition/activation) in combination with the parental socio-economic status, which in turn affects the quality and quantity of the linguistic input provided to the children, substantially influences the development of the metalinguistic awareness and vocabulary size. For bilingual children, we advocate for the vocabulary assessment in both languages and for a shared mental lexicon approach. 

References

Bialystok, E. (1992). Attentional control in children’s metalinguistic performance and measures of field independence. Developmental Psychology28(4), 654–664. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.28.4.654

Bialystok, E., & Craik, F. I. M. (2022). How does bilingualism modify cognitive function? Attention to the mechanism. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review29(4), 1246–1269. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-022-02057-5

Bleses, D., Basbøll, H., Lum, J., & Vach, W. (2011). Phonology and lexicon in a cross-linguistic perspective: The importance of phonetics – a commentary on Stoel-Gammon’s ‘Relationships between lexical and phonological development in young children’. Journal of Child Language38(1), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000910000437

Bosch, L., & Ramon-Casas, M. (2014). First translation equivalents in bilingual toddlers’ expressive vocabulary: Does form similarity matter? International Journal of Behavioral Development38(4), 317–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025414532559

Cote, L. R., & Bornstein, M. H. (2014). Productive vocabulary among three groups of bilingual American children: Comparison and prediction. First Language34(6), 467–485. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723714560178

Delucchi Danhier, R., & Mertins, B. (2018). Psycholinguistische Grundlagen der Inklusion. Schwerpunkt Bilingualismus. DoProfiL–Das Dortmunder Profil für Inklusionsorientierte Lehrerinnen-Und Lehrerbildung, 161–178. 

Fowler, A. E. (2001). How Early Phonological Development Might Set the Stage for Phoneme Awareness. In Phonological Processes in Literacy. Routledge. 

Grosjean, F. (1994). Individual bilingualism. The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics3, 1656–1660. 

Hoff, E., Core, C., Place, S., Rumiche, R., Señor, M., & Parra, M. (2012). Dual language exposure and early bilingual development. Journal of Child Language39(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000910000759

Odermann, K. (2023). Mehrsprachigkeit und Schriftspracherwerb: Vorteile von Mehrsprachigkeit durch ein früh entwickeltes metalinguistisches Bewusstsein. In B. Mertins & R. Delucchi Danhier (Eds.), Diversity in Cognition (pp. 183–201). Peter Lang. 

Odermann, K., & Mertins, B. (2025). Semantisches Bewusstsein bei Vorschulkindern: Wie Bilingualismus das metalinguistische Wissen fördert [manuscript submitted for     publication] 

Perani, D., Paulesu, E., Galles, N. S., Dupoux, E., Dehaene, S., Bewnardi, V., Cappa, S. F., Fazio, F., & Mehler, J. (1998). The bilingual brain. Proficiency and age of acquisition of the second language. Brain121(10), 1841–1852. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/121.10.1841 

Reder, F., Marec-Breton, N., Gombert, J., & Demont, E. (2013). Second-language learners’ advantage in metalinguistic awareness: A question of languages’ characteristics. British Journal of Educational Psychology83(4), 686–702. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12003 

Roehr-Brackin, K. (2024). Measuring children’s metalinguistic awareness. Language Teaching, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444824000016 

Schneider, W. (2017). Lesen und Schreiben lernen. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-50319-5