H≈E represents free variaton of the two auxiliaries where H is the first choice
E≈H signals free variaton of the two auxiliaries where E is the first choice
F = fused, a form resulting from a merger of H and E, such as seva, jera, etc.
AGREE
Past participle agreement overtly present - only subject-predicate agreements are coded.
YES → clear subject–participle agreement, e.g. s ɛ lla’vato / a (M.SG / F.SG); also includes cases such as issə s a arlaˈviːtə (PL) vs. s a arlaˈvaːtə (SG), where number agreement is expressed through metaphonic alternation of the participial root vowel.
More problematic are pairs like a maɲˈɲaːtə li mməskuttə (3SG) vs. a maɲˈɲiːtə li mməskuttə, where the alternation could reflect either subject or object agreement. Since both forms occur with identical plural objects (li mməskuttə), the opposition is interpreted as true subject–participle agreement. The same interpretation applies when the object is singular, e.g. iʃʃə s a maɲˈɲiːtə nu dɛdʤə vs. s a maɲˈɲaːtə nu dɛdʤə, where the alternation (-iː- vs. -aː-) again signals subject number rather than object agreement.
NO → cases where the past participle (PTCP) remains invariable across all morphosyntactic contexts, e.g. se:tə maɲ’ɲa:tə (2PL).
Object-triggered agreement is likewise coded as NO, e.g. s a arlaˈviːtə li maːnə, where the metaphonic plural form of the PTCP agrees with the plural object (li maːnə ‘the hands’).
In such cases, the PTCP shows the same plural form even with a singular subject (a arlaˈviːtə li maːnə), indicating that the alternation does not reflect subject agreement.
RF
Raddoppiamento fonosinttatico (phonosyntactic doubling of the initial consonant induced by the auxiliary form)
YES = (e.g.) s ɛ lla'vato
NO = (e.g.) se:tə maɲ'ɲa:tə
Dialect classification - based on Pellegrini 1977, Carta dei dialetti d`Italia
Dialect_Class_1 = macroclass (ad es. Veneto, Mediano, ...)
Dialect_Class_2 = I, II, III, ... (ad es. Marchigiano centrale, Umbro, ...)